bugtraq - Re: a method for bypassing cookie restrictions in web browsers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:04:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...ttot.org>
To: Dave McKinney <dm@...urityfocus.com>
Cc: vuln-dev@...urityfocus.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
   full-disclosure@...sys.com
Subject: Re: a method for bypassing cookie restrictions in web browsers

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Dave McKinney wrote:

> This does appear to be a known way of tracking web users without using
> cookies: http://sourcefrog.net/projects/meantime/

Yup, my apologies for this sort-of-false alert. The only excuse I can
offer is that I failed to find any related information during a routine
run of Google queries, and that the flaw is still very much alive
nowadays.

The problem is ineed known, both the use of ETags and Last-Modified
headers to store data, and the indirect variant I described later on. The
issue had been initially reported by Martin Pool here:

  http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2000/03/msg00365.html

Cheers,
-- 
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
 Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
    Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2004-01-20 01:57 --
   http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html