bugtraq - Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:09:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Mariusz Woloszyn <emsi@...rtners.pl>
To: Daniel.Capo@....net.br
Cc: computerguy@....rr.com, BUGTRAQ@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate


On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 Daniel.Capo@....net.br wrote:

> > Which means the Democrats screwed up setting up their own share point and
> > allowed public access to it.  There was no "computer glitch" which was
> > "exploited".  This was completely a human screw-up.  And there was no
> > hacking ("exploitation of a computer glitch") done by the Republicans.
> > Unless you wish to call clicking on a share point configured with public
> > access and opening it up "hacking".
>
> AFAIK, "hacking" is legally defined in the USA as being unauthorized
> access to computer resources. It doesn't matter if the resource was
> adequately protected (or protected at all) in first place or not. If you
> were not given permission to make use of that resource, you are
> criminally liable.
>
Do you have an explicit permission to read the content of a www.cnn.com?
What is the difference between opening a web URL and a network share?

-- 
Mariusz Wołoszyn
Internet Security Specialist, GTS - Internet Partners