bugtraq - Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:59:51 -0600
From: vord <vordhosbn@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida


Al Qaeda is to Iraq what electronic voting is to the bush election win.

--vord

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:06:13 -0600, Stef <stefmit@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:23:55 -0600, Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu> wrote:
> 
> > I disagree.  Until the research is credible and vetted, investigating is
> > premature.  Many people don't seem to understand, investigating supposed
> > discrepancies in the vote costs millions of dollars.  The recount in Ohio
> > will cost the state $1.5 million.  That's money that could pay for other
> > things.  So you don't run off on wild goose chases just because some
> > "researcher" says, "Oooooo, look at this.  This looks really unusual."
> 
> Oh, yes, they/we do ... based on a comparison with another well known
> "triplet": money spent <--> amount of credible information <-->
> importance to the United States, when having invaded Iraq, I think we
> could and should justify an investigation like the above ...
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html