lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:54:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Laudanski <zx@...tlecops.com> To: Debasis Mohanty <mail@...kingspirits.com> Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, 'Zone Labs Security Team' <security@...elabs.com> Subject: RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote: > >> Paul Laudanski > >> What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5 > are not vulnerable in the report. > > Funny Paul!! You are simple exaggerating upon the same point again and again > in a new style each time. Well, They don't even say that ZAP versions prior > to v5 are vulnerable in their advisory. Glad I made you laugh. We are at odds in this clearly. Zone Labs aka Cisco imvho has issued a fair and accurate release indicating what is not vulnerable and thereby conversely you know which products are. To that end... I move on. Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists