bugtraq - Re: [ GLSA 200512-04 ] Openswan, IPsec-Tools: Vulnerabilities in ISAK MP Protocol implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:24:37 +0100
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <yvan.vanhullebus@...asq.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@...erance.com>
Cc: Thierry Carrez <koon@...too.org>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	gentoo-announce@...ts.gentoo.org, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
	security-alerts@...uxsecurity.com
Subject: Re:  [ GLSA 200512-04 ] Openswan,
	IPsec-Tools: Vulnerabilities in ISAK MP Protocol implementation

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:49:40PM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> 
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >Gentoo Linux Security Advisory                           GLSA 200512-04
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >                                           http://security.gentoo.org/
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >
> > Severity: Normal
> >    Title: Openswan, IPsec-Tools: Vulnerabilities in ISAKMP Protocol
> >           implementation
> >     Date: December 12, 2005
> >     Bugs: #112568, #113201
> >       ID: 200512-04
> 
> >Openswan and IPsec-Tools suffer from an implementation flaw which may
> >allow a Denial of Service attack.
> 
> That is correct (for openswan)

It is also correct for ipsec-tools, but require a very weak
configuration.


> >Impact
> >======
> >
> >A remote attacker can create a specially crafted packet using 3DES with
> >an invalid key length, resulting in a Denial of Service attack, format
> >string vulnerabilities or buffer overflows.
> 
> That's a copy and paste from the IPsec proto testsuite.
> 
> 1) It conflicts with the above comment that this is only a DOS
> 2) It's incorrect (for openswan)

Also incorrect for ipsec-tools AFAIK. The only problem we noticed with
protos testsuite was a lack of verification for some payloads
existency in aggressive mode.


> >Workaround
> >==========
> >
> >Avoid using "aggressive mode" in ISAKMP Phase 1, which exchanges
> >information between the sides before there is a secure channel.
> 
> In fact, you would to both have aggressive mode enabled AND know the PSK.
> If you have those two enabled, you are vulnerable to a MITM anyway, since
> any client knowing the PSK can pretend to be the IPsec security gateway.

Knowing the PSK is not really needed, as AGGRESSIVE+PSK mode is known
to be quite unsecure, and can be bruteforced offline.

The "workaround" for ipsec-tools is to upgrade, and is only needed for
some people which really have a week configuration and should care
about lots of potential problems !


Yvan, ipsec-tools team.

-- 
NETASQ - Secure Internet Connectivity
http://www.netasq.com

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3393 bytes)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/