bugtraq - Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: when will AV vendors fix this???

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:07:39 +0545
From: "Bipin Gautam" <gautam.bipin@...il.com>
To: "Paul Schmehl" <pauls@...allas.edu>
Cc: "Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov" <D.Yu.Bolkhovityanov@....nsk.su>,
	full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	"Thomas D." <whistl0r@...glemail.com>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: when will AV vendors fix this???

I'd still argue... If the malicious code is a known variant and
recides in the computer exploiting the stated flaw, here are ppl.
argueing the AV will catch it during execution anyways. BUT there are
many scenerios when ADVANCE HERCULES SCAN, suspecious activity scans
etc are only (mostly) enabled for testing DURING MANUAL SCANS as
having those enabled during auto protect would cause significant
preformance problems. (think of this scenerio again)

& lastly... NOD32  has an option to scan inside ADS too.

guys..... could anyone suggest any AV that isn't buggy to this trick?

-----
on vacation,
-bipin