full-disclosure

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

From: Btd at valmont.com (Dehner, Benjamin T.)
Subject: OT: Snosoft vs HP

Security through litigation:

"Our product is secure, because we will sue you if you say otherwise."

While HP may or may not be legally in the right -- I'll let the lawyers
decide that -- I'm the one going to be up at 3AM rebuilding a server some
blackhat crashed.  And I don't get paid by the hour.  I intend to have a
talk with the IS director about our future acquisition and use of HP
equipment.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia@...sics.uc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:53 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP

Actually HP was pissed at Theo for what OpenSSH did.

It sounds like HP had to hire back the OSF/1 (oops mach opps 
Utitrix oops Tru64) people back to make patches for OpenSSH.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Full-Disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives