[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: SMoyer at rgare.com (Moyer, Shawn)
Subject: David Shiner/ITM/DCC/DCX is out of the offi
ce. [so OT it's not even funny ]
You're thinking Europeans date format. Here in the US, we usually use
MM/DD/YY, so he's probably out more like 4 days.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JLETOUX@...yguestelecom.fr [mailto:JLETOUX@...yguestelecom.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 12:24
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] David Shiner/ITM/DCC/DCX is out of the
> offi ce.
>
>
> 4 months out of his boxes... he's kind of abnormal guy, isn't
> he ? How can
> he do that ? ;)
> I think he will be too hurry to repair his boxes when
> returning to answer
> our messages ;)
> Nice day :)
>
> regards,
>
> Jean-Marc LE TOUX
> [...] but this is generally not a real limitation (it means
> that you can't
> have timeouts longer than 248 days on a x86, tough luck).
> (Linus, discussing
> how kernel timeouts should be implemented.)
>
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De: Raju Mathur [mailto:raju@...ux-delhi.org]
> Date: jeudi 8 ao?t 2002 18:16
> ?: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Objet: [Full-Disclosure] David Shiner/ITM/DCC/DCX is out of
> the office.
>
>
> >>>>> "ds187" == ds187 <ds187@...mlerchrysler.com> writes:
>
> ds187> I will be out of the
> ds187> office starting 08/08/2002 and will not return until
> ds187> 08/12/2002.
>
> ds187> I will respond to your message when I return.
>
> Good time to r00t his boxes, huh?
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Full-Disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Full-Disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists