full-disclosure - Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: odin at cleannorth.org (Dan Brosemer)
Subject: Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:59:14AM +0100, John Cartwright wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:48:14PM -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:
> 
> > How about leaving it as the poster specifies?  
> 
> FYI:
> 
> "When set to Poster, no Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although 
> if one is present in the original message, it is not stripped."
> 
> Apologies for not clarifying this before the poll started.

Thank you very much!  I'm heading to vote now.

-Dan

-- 
"Burnished gallows set with red
 Caress the fevered, empty mind
 Of man who hangs bloodied and blind
 To reach for wisdom, not for bread."  -- Deoridhe Grimsdaughter