full-disclosure - interesting?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: batsy at vapour.net (batz)
Subject: interesting?

On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Gregory Steuck wrote:

:da/dt is a clear sign of differential equation (which they mention in
:the paper). So, "d" is NOT iteration nor is it a factor in "da", it's a
:marker of differential.

As I said, I was speaking outside my depth. The question isn't
one of whether I am right or wrong, but rather, why I would be 
either. I was hoping that someone with a math background would
offer their opinion regarding whether this equation could be 
also be used to describe the economy of vulnerability 
information distribution and disclosure.  

Thanks for the correction though. 

-- 
batz