lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: erc at pobox.com (Ed Carp) Subject: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution? Overkill. Why not use squid, which is included with every Linux system? > -----Original Message----- > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of KF > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 5:12 AM > To: Nick Jacobsen > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content > Monitoring solution? > > > Snort? > > http://www.snort.org/cgi-bin/sigs-search.cgi?sid=porn > > -KF > > > Nick Jacobsen wrote: > > >Not sure that this is an exactly suitable topic, but anything > seems to go, > >so... > > > >I am trying to find an open source (read free) PASSIVE web content > >monitoring solution. We are looking for something that can be put on a > >network, and using promiscuous mode, capture and analyze web > traffic, etc... > >We would obviously place this in such a way that all network > traffic would > >pass by it. Any suggestions would be welcome, though again, I am looking > >for something specifically designed to do this, as I know I could modify > >existing tools myself... > > > >Nick > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists