lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: salgatt at turtleshell.net (Scott M. Algatt)
Subject: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign

I am not sure if it will affect the Digital Certificates but when using
PKI and Outlook XP, you need to modify the below reg key :

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Security\UseCRLChasing

It is set at 1 you need to change it to 2.  If you don't change that,
Outlook will look like it dies and hangs for minutes when dealing with PKI
certificates.


Regards,

Scott M. Algatt

Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

On Fri, 9 May 2003, Kamal Habayeb wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to get some expert opinions on which is better.  Using Outlook
> 2002, would it be better to use PGP to encrypt messages or use the built-in
> option with a digital certificate from Verisign (or some other CA)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kamal
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists