full-disclosure - Fw: A question for the list...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: se_cur_ity at hotmail.com (morning_wood)
Subject: Fw: A question for the list...

What if you manufactured a "top secret" document? Unless someone could
actually verify it was a genuine document and not a fake, would it be
violating any thing? Creative writing can go quite far..
Project: Magic or Majestic ring any bells?
wood

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ulysse" <ulysse@...chat.org>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:46 AM
Subject: RE : [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...


> I am not sure there's only the "copyright problem"...
> I would'nt try, if I found a "top secret folder"  of the french secret
> services to cut and paste it to some mailing list, even if I attribute
> it to the author!
>
> Ulysse
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
> > Nick Jacobsen
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:10 AM
> > To: Cedric Blancher; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...
> >
> >
> > There is one thing sort of left out so far, I beleive...
> > according to most
> > jurisdictions, wether something is copyrighted or not, you
> > still have the
> > right to qoute from it, as long as you attribute it to the author.
> >
> > Ethics
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cedric Blancher" <blancher@...tel-securite.fr>
> > To: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@...mail.com>
> > Cc: "Ed Carp" <erc@...ox.com>; "Full-Disclosure@...ts. Netsys. Com"
> > <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
> > Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 11:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...
> >
> >
> > > Le mar 27/05/2003 ? 01:34, morning_wood a ?crit :
> > > > Mail is private until read, just because its labled as
> > "mail" does not
> > > > imply land based mail laws in whatever country you are in apply.
> > >
> > > In France, jurisprudence tends to treat email exactly as
> > common mail in
> > > terms of privacy. Thus, according to this, you should not forward
> > > private email without explicit sender's authorization as an example.
> > >
> > > --
> > > C?dric Blancher  <blancher@...tel-securite.fr>
> > > IT systems and networks security - Cartel S?curit?
> > > Phone : +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99
> > > PGP KeyID:157E98EE
> > FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>