From: security at brvenik.com (Jason)
Subject: Zone Alarm

Unfortunately the $40 'hardware' devices are not either.

Please reference the excellent work by Core
http://www1.corest.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=276&idxseccion=10

and the _much_ more expensive 'hardware' devices are just as prone

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/pix-multiple-vuln-pub.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/pixfirewall-authen-flood-pub.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/PIXfirewallSMTPfilter-regression-pub.shtml
...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/advisory.html

For a personal solution Zone Alarm is quite possibly more adequate and 
appropriate.

morning_wood wrote:

>Zone Alarmbuy a $40 hardware router. Software firewalls are not a security solution IMHO.
>
>morning_wood
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Ben Tyson-Norrman 
>  To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com 
>  Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:53 AM
>  Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm
>
>
>  I'm not sure I can ask this question without derision, but here goes... 
>
>  Zone Alarm, is it really as crap as everyone makes out.... or is the usual posturing by ill-informed...? 
>
>  Many thanks all 
>
>  Visit our web site @ www.twowaytv.com 
>  This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. If you are not a named addressee or have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately at postmaster@...waytv.co.uk and then delete this e-mail. As Internet communications are not secure we do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or responsibility for any change made to this message after the original sender sent it.  Save for this legal notice, the contents or opinions contained within this e-mail are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Two Way TV Ltd unless otherwise specifically stated. 
>
>  
>

Hosted by DataForce ISP - Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux