lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: ben at twowaytv.co.uk (Ben Tyson-Norrman)
Subject: Zone Alarm

What's worse is not only did I forget to switch to plain text - but out
stupid mail server sticks some marketing junk on the end as well....

Like anyone on this list would go to MIP anyway :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Schmehl, Paul L [mailto:pauls@...allas.edu]
Sent: 04 June 2003 18:52
To: Ben Tyson-Norrman; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm


I'm not sure why you'd expect derision for that question.  I'd be more
likely to give it to you for using HTML email. :-)

Zone Alarm is fine for a home user on the Internet.  It's certainly
better than putting an unprotected Windows box out there.  I'd
personally prefer a DSL router or a *nix box running a "real" firewall,
but ZA is fine for most people.

Who's the "everyone" who say that ZA is crap?

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Tyson-Norrman [mailto:ben@...waytv.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:53 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm


I'm not sure I can ask this question without derision, but here goes... 
Zone Alarm, is it really as crap as everyone makes out.... or is the
usual posturing by ill-informed...? 

Visit our web site @ www.twowaytv.com 
This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
recipient(s) only and may be confidential, legally privileged and protected
by law. If you are not a named addressee or have received this transmission
in error, please notify us immediately at postmaster@...waytv.co.uk and then
delete this e-mail. As Internet communications are not secure we do not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or
responsibility for any change made to this message after the original sender
sent it.  Save for this legal notice, the contents or opinions contained
within this e-mail are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily
represent those of Two Way TV Ltd unless otherwise specifically stated. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030605/a504a7b8/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ