| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: martin at hardlined.com (Martin Ekendahl) Subject: Administrivia: Poll So now we are going from unmoderated, to moderate on case to case basis? What stops him from getting a new e-mail, posting under a different name etc etc. This list is turning into a fucking joke, and its not because of one "morning_wood" "Full-Disclosure - We believe in it." 1.) The act or process of revealing or uncovering. 2.) Something uncovered; a revelation. So wouldn't covering up members go against that gay motto? Can we also vote to ban html e-mail. I also ask for a vote to ban admin's so this can truely be unmoderated. kthx. On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:37:49 -0400 Len Rose <len@...sys.com> wrote: > > I've created a poll to address this "Morning Wood" issue. > Quite a few people have been contacting us in regards to > his behaviour on the list and needless to say no small > number of people have left the list because of recent activity. > > http://www.netsys.com/cgi-bin/poll?pn=7 > > We'll wait a week before taking any action. > > Note: We can moderate individuals who are problematic but we > are loath to actually remove someone from the list because there > is always hope for improvement. I am optimistic that if people > can be made aware of their anti-social behaviour they often > change for the better. We're all human and we've all got our > faults! > > Len > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists