lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: MRMyers at anteon.com (Myers, Marvin) Subject: Destroying PCs remotely? You have missed the point, we are trying to make an example of these types of scofflaws. You have to smash the windshield before you have any proof that the person was going to cut you off. That way other people would not be inclined to cut you off because of the example that you have created. Nowhere does Mr. Hatch define what proof he would use as evidence to destroy these computers or allow any defense. Guilty and executed before even being able to try to prove your innocence. Way to go ORRIN. -----Original Message----- From: Golomb, Gary [mailto:GGolomb@...erasys.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:16 PM To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Destroying PCs remotely? > > > > "Senator Orrin Hatch, a Republican representing Utah, asked > > technology chiefs about whether they could develop ways to > > damage or destroy the computers hearing in Washington on Tuesday" > > Alright, now we're talking!!! Marshal law! Next time I see someone change lanes without using their turn signal, I'm going to follow them and smash-in their windshield... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists