lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L) Subject: A worm... I can't speak for the others, but McAfee was detecting this worm just fine as soon as it hit our network. The only thing wrong was that it didn't have the name correct, but who really cares about that? We set up our scanners to always scan archives and zip files, so something like this is no big deal. We've quarantined over 900 copies in the past 20 hours, so it's a big deal to somebody.... Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ > -----Original Message----- > From: ATD [mailto:simon@...soft.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:15 AM > To: *Hobbit* > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] A worm... > > > Yes, > And this was my point. Are the crafty "worm gods" > creating worms that evade detection by using compression and > other methods? If they are doing this, and if they are > creating the "stealth worms" whats next. Zip files would be > just one of hundreds of ways to hide worms. Maybe the virus > scanning technology needs to be kicked up a notch or two.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists