full-disclosure - Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Danny.Miller at cbeyond.net (Danny Miller)
Subject: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters)

So, customer demand, security and most-effective-software-to-do-the-job
aside...I wonder what kind of deal Microsoft cut with the Government?  I
wonder who, if anyone, got bumped out?

Anyone else catch the story on /. Yesterday about the Munich deal?

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/15/1854215

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: northern snowfall [mailto:dbailey27@...ritech.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Brad Bemis
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid (
Reuters)

>
>
>You are absolutely right!  I will not argue this point at all.  The
only
>thing I will say is that product security is based on a process of
>evolution.  My statement was intended to indicate that it is customer
>demand that drives the speed of that evolution.  
>
No. Customer demand should play the *least* part in security evolution.
The *main* thing that security analysts and security developers should
focus on are the capabilities of the opposition, whomever they may be.
Your foe is not your customer, and if he is he will not lead you toward
pleasant waters. Again, your thinking is dangerous.

Don

http://www.7f.no-ip.com/~north_



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html