full-disclosure - dcom exploit code observations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: list at hardlined.com (Shanphen Dawa)
Subject: dcom exploit code observations

I would also like to know, since I though the remote computer would experience some sort of DoS instead of exploitation if the wrong return address was used.

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:20:20 +0200
Knud Erik H?jgaard <kain@...op.dk> wrote:

> morning_wood wrote:
> [snip]
> > THIS IS NOT THE CASE...
> > this .bat works perfect...
> 
> So somehow running the exploit from a .bat file with some shameless
> selfpromotion makes svchost _not_ crash upon hitting a wrong return address?
> 
> Would you care to elaborate on how you pull that off?
> 
> --
> kokanin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 


-- 
/*
"To avoid all evil, to cultivate good, 
and to cleanse one's mind  
this is the teaching of the Buddhas."

Martin Ekendahl
http://www.hardlined.com
martin@...dlined.com
*/