full-disclosure - f-prot not catching mimail ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: nik at aboleo.net (Nik Reiman)
Subject: f-prot not catching mimail ?

As previously noted, the problem here seems to be with the f-prot
binary, not the actual virus signatures/definitions.  Try upgrading
the f-prot package, and it'll probably work fine.

-Nik

psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au quoth:
> >>I cannot see anything "special" in the MIME structure of Mimail that would
> >>cause f-prot to miss the ZIP attachment (or maybe it is the structure of
> >>the ZIP that f-prot cannot unpack?).
> > 
> > I was told its the encoding scheme in the .html file thats the problem. 
> > Currently the scanner does not support that type of encoding.
> 
> It seems to me that the HTML contains the binary EXE without any encoding:
> 
> $ cat -v message.html | fold | head -5
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Location:File://foo.exe
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
> 
> MZM-^P^@^C^@^@^@^D^@^@^@...?M-^?^@^@...^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@
> 
> Regardless, f-prot should list the ZIP attachment, and the files contained
> within the ZIP ...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Paul Szabo - psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au  http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/
> School of Mathematics and Statistics  University of Sydney   2006  Australia
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> 

-- 
Nik Reiman // nik@...leo.net \\ http://www.aboleo.net