| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: eckman at umn.edu (Brian Eckman) Subject: Red Bull Worm Joel R. Helgeson wrote: > Lets see, the last big worm to exploit windows was named Code Red after the > Mountain Dew Code Red was brought to market. Being that this worm is much > more effective than Code Red ever was, I say worm should be named Red Bull > as it is sure to exhibit much more energy than the Code Red worm. > Pardon me if I am just plain ignorant, but where is this worm, and how on earth is it "more effective than Code Red ever was" already if nobody is talking about it? The only evidence of a worm I have seen is one person showing comments supposedly from source code of some program calling itself a worm... Brian -- Brian Eckman Security Analyst OIT Security and Assurance University of Minnesota 612-626-7737 "There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists