full-disclosure - MSblast worm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Mike.Keighley at lexicon.co.uk (Mike.Keighley@...icon.co.uk)
Subject: MSblast worm

Ah, yes.  The vulnerability does indeed exist in NT.
But with respect, what Jasper asks is whether the *MSblast worm* affects 
NT ?
The exploit code and discussions on here seem to suggest it targets only 
2000 and XP.

Does *this exploit* target NT successfully ?  Not that I have seen / 
heard.
Could an exploit be written which exploits NT ?  Oh yes.

-- 
Mike

Simon Glassman <simon@...box.co.uk> wrote:
> This is affecting the following machines.
> Windows NT 4.0 server
> Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition
> Windows 2000
> Windows XP 32 Bit Edition
> Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
> Windows Server 2003 32 Bit Edition
> Windows Server 2003 64 Bit Edition
> More info <snip> security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp

>> On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53 am, Jasper Blackwell wrote:
>> Does anyone know if this MSblast worm affects Win NT machines, 
>> or is it just infecting 2000 and XP.