lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: Zach.Forsyth at kiandra.com (Zach Forsyth)
Subject: Firewalls

Yes - I love running hardware firewall between me and other work
colleagues.
Just plonk the laptop down on the desk next to the ageing 386 bsd box
firewalling me from the corp network.

Then when I go out to a clients, I take the bsd box along as well.
Then when I travel somewhere I take the bsd box and plug it into the
hotel's network. They don't mind the extra power costs.

I am sure you realise there is a place for software as well as hardware
firewalls.
Personally I don't mind sygate pfp for duties on my laptop. Seems to do
the job pretty well.

Cheers

z

-----Original Message-----
From: CHeeKY [mailto:cheekypeople@...33.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 15:19 PM
To: joey2cool@...oo.com; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls


why are you buying application layer firewalls? dont as a security
person you learn anything?

get hold of a spare 386, and make a netbsd, ipcop, smoothwall, linux
based firewall, alot of fun and a shit load better, I will personally
stick with my checkpoint box, but please please start taking ya
firewalls of your own machines, they deserve a place of their own, ON
THEIR OWN BOX, Tiny and the rest have all been breached with deep packet
inspections through nemesis, at the end of the day, its still Layer 7

Regards
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joey" <joey2cool@...oo.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls


> I remember using atguard a long time ago. Symantec
> bought atguard and now uses the engine in Norton
> Personal Firewall/Internet Security. I personally
> don't like NPF.
>
> I used Tiny Personal Firewall 1.x before they were
> bought by Kerio. Kerio Personal Firewall is the
> replacement to TPF. Their latest beta causes error
> messages on my computer but other than that it looks
> great. Im using the stable version 2.15 until they
> sort all of the bugs out :
>
> Stable:
> http://www.kerio.com/dwn/kpf2-en-win.exe
>
> 4.0 RC3:
> http://www.kerio.com/dwn/kpf4-beta.exe
>
> They also have great support forums: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/keriofirewall/
>
> > > anyway, it appears it's finally time to move on
> > from atguard and I was
> > > wondering if anyone here has any suggestions for
> > something simple and
> > > similar.
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software 
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ