full-disclosure - CERT Employee Gets Owned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: alexander.s at mccd.edu (Steven Alexander)
Subject: CERT Employee Gets Owned

Technically speaking, "pedophile" refers to a person who is sexually
attracted to pre-pubescent kids.  A person who has sex with or is
attracted to someone who is pubescent but underage may be considered
perverse but is not technically a pedophile.

-steven

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:tss@....fi] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:26 PM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] CERT Employee Gets Owned
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 18:21, Nelson wrote:
> > I disagree, pedophilia is about security, because we have 
> to know how 
> > the users are using the network. It's about Security Policy.
> 
> Sorry for yet another _really_ off-topic post, but this 
> pedophilia talk got me really annoyed.
> 
> Is someone a pedophile just because he had sex with underaged 
> girl? Underaged meaning against the laws of the country where 
> the it was done?
> 
> You know, south africans allow girls to get married at the 
> age of 12. Or so the web told me. Several other countries had 
> 14-16 age limits. Those countries must be full of pedophiles!
> 
> The age itself doesn't make any difference, it's about if the 
> person is physically and mentally ready. Of course for most 
> people that's around 14-16 (AFAIK).
> 
> I think this case is really stupid. The guy said exactly what 
> he wanted and didn't lie about his age or anything. Probably 
> he didn't give any threats or anything like it. Did "she" 
> even say she's not interested ("I'm 15" doesn't count)? At 
> most it's morally questionable if it's right to keep sending 
> sexual harassment emails, which the receiver could just 
> delete among the other sex spam she gets.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>