full-disclosure - MS Blaster author / morning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: peter at trusteddebian.org (Peter Busser)
Subject: MS Blaster author / morning_wood misinformed

Hi!

On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 06:46:00PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 1:32 AM +0200 yossarian <yossarian@...net.nl> 
> wrote:
> >
> >Bit sad this has to be explained. Think some people in security need some
> >legal training.
> 
> Really?  I prefer not to assume things, which is why I asked him for 
> clarification.  Perhaps you assume laws are the same everywhere.  I don't.
> 
> In the context of the discussion, however, it seemed that he was saying 
> that entering an unlocked house is not a crime in his country.  That is why 
> I asked for clarification.

You assumed I was saying that. :-)

Both are criminal activities, but breaking into a house is a heavier crime than
entering an unlocked house. I don't know the difference, but there is a
significant difference in the maximum penalty between the two.

I also think that a system administrator should provide a credible explaination
of the things he did to protect his system. If you do nothing or not enough,
you are more or less inviting someone to break into your system.

Groetjes,
Peter Busser
-- 
The Adamantix Project
Taking trustworthy software out of the labs, and into the real world
http://www.adamantix.org/