[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: stephen.perciballi at ca.mci.com (Stephen Perciballi)
Subject: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their
customers?
Seems like a pretty stringent AUP. That would be annoying if you were
trying to use an IRC server over your WAN for company communications or
the like.
________________________________________________________________
Stephen Perciballi phone: 1-416-216-5141
Internet Security Specialist cell : 1-416-877-1808
MCI pager: sperciba-pager@...mci.com
www.mci.com/ca 24/7 : 1-888-886-3865
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, morning_wood wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their
> customers?
>
>
> >
> > It's not really common practice for transit type providers to do this.
> > The networks are typically engineered to forward packets and not filter
> > them. Hopefully the providers have dedicated staff to handle abuse. In
> > that case issues should be handled on a case-by-case basis.
>
> in my local area comcast is blocking 135 and 445, further I have advised comcast
> of thinknaw, just dont give it out
> of blocking inbound 6667 as i feel this would reduce many of the mechanisims
> using [sd]bot type agents attacking against ircd.
> since running a IRC server is in contrast to thier ToS.
>
> DMCA observances:
> quote from comcast tv commercial "download your favorite music, and movie
> trailers online" - - note the use of the phrase "trailers" to note the
> destinction between them ( legal ) and full movies ( illegal ), but nothing
> about said music ( of which you can get "trailers" of commercial releases (
> legal )) as opposed to commercial releases ( illegal ).
>
>
> Donnie Werner
> http://e2-labs.com
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists