| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected) On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:46:20 +0545, npguy <npguy@...net.com> said: > trust http://www.phrack.org! How do we know it hasn't been hacked and a bogus issue put up, or a real issue suppressed? (this is where everybody who's not familiar with it should go re-read Ken Thompson's "Reflections on Trusting Trust" (http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/) The "unknown Air Force document" is this: "Multics Security Evaluation: Vulnerability Analysis* by Karger and Schell http://www.acsac.org/2002/papers/classic-multics-orig.pdf Those who think a 30-year-old paper is irrelevant and crufty should read the same author's retrospective: "Thirty Years Later: Lessons from the Multics Security Evaluation" http://www.acsac.org/2002/papers/classic-multics.pdf Trust? What's that? Pass me the tinfoil, I need to make a helmet. ;) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030922/5035746a/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists