lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:08:57PM +0200, Michal Zalewski wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
> > Especially as some of the flaws (the replay attacks) are actually
> > documented in the manual.
> 
> And correct me if I am wrong, but it appears to me that replay attacks are
> not that much of a concern when encrypting TCP/IP packets?

The manual mentions replay attacks on CIPE management traffic, but I'm
not familiar enough with this aspect of the protocol to judge the
impact.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists