lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) Subject: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:08:57PM +0200, Michal Zalewski wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Especially as some of the flaws (the replay attacks) are actually > > documented in the manual. > > And correct me if I am wrong, but it appears to me that replay attacks are > not that much of a concern when encrypting TCP/IP packets? The manual mentions replay attacks on CIPE management traffic, but I'm not familiar enough with this aspect of the protocol to judge the impact.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists