lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: flynngn at jmu.edu (Gary Flynn) Subject: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws I would think a better way of determining if a patch is actually installed on a system is by examining the files on the system rather than to depend upon symptoms (scanners) or installation logs (registry entries). If the add/remove software control panel, registry, or msi say the machine is patched but the files aren't there, an installation problem occurred. If the scanners say the machine is not patched but the files are there then either the patch is ineffective in that machine's particular configuration (PATH?) or the scanner is generating a false positive. -- Gary Flynn Security Engineer - Technical Services James Madison University Please R.U.N.S.A.F.E. http://www.jmu.edu/computing/runsafe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists