lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa) Subject: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:39:14PM -0500, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > > As I said, I also think that Micro$oft is as insecure as my 8 > > y/o daughter playing with a handgun. > > > Your daughter wouldn't be insecure playing with a handgun if she had had > proper handgun safety training. Wouldn't the same be true of computer > users? Agree. But this training should start with developers and admins, don't you think ? How good is security training for a user that runs insecure software over a insecure network environment ? Ok, I'm supposing you did read the rest of my previous e-mail. My whole point is: I do think Windows is insecure, but one cannot blame Windows alone. There are many, many server still vulnerable to CodeRed, and that, these days, is mostly a fault of the server admin. []s -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org> "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030929/692d3df0/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists