| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: cheekypeople at sec33.com (Lee) Subject: W2K source "leaked"? ok let get some reality here and quit on the sensationalism here.... All universities and selected folk have copies of the source, so it was bound to find a way out shortly, the leaked copy is 660mb in size, the full source for MS win2k is over 40GIG so we have 1/100 of the code, so some piss ant student working on it, decided to plug in his usb drive and copy it across to impress his mates on IRC... Big dam wow....... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Griffin" <b.griffin@....edu.au> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 6:02 AM Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] W2K source "leaked"? > Hey all > > I find these 'visions of doom' quite funny when stated on this list. > Wasn't full-disclosure started around the time MS, SF (or is that > Symantec) and others started secret squirrelling about exploits and > source code etc? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Byron Copeland [mailto:nodialtone@...cast.net] > > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:44 PM > > To: Isaac Privett > > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] W2K source "leaked"? > > > > Well, in instances like this, however unfortunate, I think > > this probably is only the beginning of mangled code we'll be > > seeing. Anyone else have visions of mayhem as well? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists