full-disclosure - [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: cdevoney at u.washington.edu (Chris DeVoney)
Subject: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses 

On Friday, March 05, 2004 12:20 PM, Curt Purdy wrote:

> Methinks you misunderstand.  Only the proprietary extension, 
> i.e. .inc or .xyz or .whatever, would be allowed through, and 
> since virus writers would never use this extension, it would 
> eliminate ALL viruses at the gateway.
> The nice thing about this approach is that it completely 
> eliminates the need for any anti-virus on the mail server 
> since all virus attachments are automatically dropped without 
> the need for scanning.  Quite a simple, yet elegant solution, 
> if I do say so myself.

And (I think this paraphrases a collective thought) happens when the virus
writers start sending attachments using that "magic" extension and include a
social-engineered message in the e-mail to rename this thing to a .exe and
execute it.?


cdv

------------------------
Chris DeVoney
Clinical Research Center Informatics
University of Washington
cdevoney@...ashington.edu
206-598-6816 
------------------------