full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: dave at horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall)
Subject: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Daniele Muscetta wrote:

> ....I know, you roughly have some 26 Megabytes of patches to be installed
> POST-SP4 and POST IE60SP1 on W2K.
>
> Is any other OS any better lately ?

OpenBSD.  FreeBSD.  NetBSD.  BSD/OS.  See the pattern?

I had a BSD/OS box exposed to the Net without a firewall for *years*;
it was quite funny watching Penguin/OS exploits against it.

-- 
Dave Horsfall  DTM  VK2KFU                         Loyal Unix user since 1975
Booted from Spamtools for dissing the moderator: www.horsfall.org/levine.mail