full-disclosure - Re: Use of Brutus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: chrisgsharp at yahoo.com (Chris Sharp)
Subject: Re: Use of Brutus

Well, my opinion of this group just went down a few notches.  As hard as it may be to believe, there are actually some people that want to use tools like this to safeguard their applications.  Grow up.

starwars <nobody@...ooine.homelinux.net> wrote:Chris Sharp wrote:

> I've been trying for some time now to use Brutus (BrutusA2.exe) to help
> with an internal review of the security of the user passwords for an
> application. I'm having some trouble getting Brutus to work with
> form-based authentication and am hoping to find some additional
> information on how I can configure the .bad file. Currently I'm getting
> false-positive results for the user ID's and Passwords being used.

It might be easier to *buy* access to your favourite pr0n site if you 
cannot figure out how to crack it.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040506/a09fb4b0/attachment.html