lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: keydet89 at yahoo.com (Harlan Carvey)
Subject: Calcuating Loss

Kurt,

I understand.  I just left the private sector.  The
best I could get the IT folks to do was to roll the
patches out on less critical systems first.  However,
even that didn't keep things from happening w/ regards
to SQL Server...one issue was traced back (by
Microsoft, no less) to a hotfix.



--- Kurt <kurtbuff@...o.net> wrote:
> Yup.
> 
> I do it all the time.
> 
> Management is simply not interested in providing a
> test network. I can't
> even seem to scrounge a couple of desktop-class
> machines most of the
> time.
> 
> It's pathetic, but it's the way that many companies
> operate.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On
> Behalf Of Harlan
> Carvey
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 08:38
> To: Full-Disclosure
> Cc: Clint Bodungen
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Calcuating Loss
> 
> 
> Clint...
> 
> Two words..."testing process".  What happened to
> that?
>  Don't tell me you're installing patches directly to
> production systems...
> 
> --- Clint Bodungen <clint@...ureconsulting.com>
> wrote:
> > How about when Micro$oft releases a bundled patch
> > (cough cough MS04-011) to
> > fix several bugs and security holes (supposedly to
> > help "minimize loss" from
> > these bugs and worms) only to find out that the
> > patch itself has broken just
> > as many services as it fixed, taking down one's
> > server for a few hours,
> > causing yet... more loss!  ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > > Loss?
> > >
> > > One of my biggest complaints is the way the
> > industry "loses billions"
> > > whenever a virus or worm breaks out.
> > >
> > > I mean, securing and maintain your server is not
> a
> > loss. Installing and
> > > updating your anti virus or IDS package is not a
> > loss. All of these
> > > things should have been done anyway.
> > >
> > > If a server goes off line, I guess you could
> > measure the revenue it may
> > > have produced as a loss, but technically, that
> is
> > lack of income, not
> > > true loss.
> > >
> > > If you see someone complaining about all the
> money
> > they lost doing what
> > > they should have been doing all along, I just
> see
> > spin. And politics.
> > >
> > > M
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter:
> http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ