full-disclosure - Re: Cisco's stolen code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: coldfire at shady.org (Cold Fire)
Subject: Re: Cisco's stolen code

On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:32:28AM +0100, Marek Isalski wrote:
> 
> > When I was a Police Officer in the U.K. the definition of Theft was ( and 
> > had been for a LONG time ):
> > "Dishonestly obtains the property of another with the intent to 
> > permanently deprive them of it."
> 
> IIRC, that law finally got patched a few years ago so that people who pinch cars for a joy ride could still be sentenced.
> 

Thats still the definition of Theft, Joyriders are not charged with
Theft, they get charged with Taking Without Owners Consent, which
I believe only applies to Vehicles, not Cisco source.

CF

-- 
'Cold Fire, Britains most notorious hacker' Observer, July 1996
'The most recent conviction was that of [Cold Fire] whose On-line
escapades spanned from hacking into educational sites to more
sinister activities such as tapping into industrial and United
States military sites.' DC Paul Cox, SO6 Scotland Yard CCU