full-disclosure - Re: Cisco's stolen code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: aditya.deshmukh at online.gateway.technolabs.net (Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh])
Subject: Re: Cisco's stolen code


> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Eric Scher
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:25 AM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >On Tue, 2004-05-25  Tobias W.  wrote:
> >
> >Well, let's face the simple facts. Cisco's code is copyrighted and it's
> >illegal to copy it, distribute it or even use it. There's no way around
> >it. 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> STATEMENT: "There's no way around it."
> 
> RESPONSE: I beg to differ. No disrespect intended, but given the 

> UNITED STATES CODE - TITLE 17 - CHAPTER ONE - SECTION 107
> 
> Sec. 107.  -  Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use 
> 


are there any lawayers on the list who can confirm / deny this ? or any other list where i can ask this. this has started to get intresting from the legal point of view !


-aditya


________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)