full-disclosure - Re: Cisco's stolen code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: Cisco's stolen code 

On Wed, 26 May 2004 14:36:13 PDT, Benjamin Krueger said:

> A confidential, copyrighted, and incriminating document is leaked out of a major institution
> and in to the hands of a journalism organization. The document is intensely scrutinized by
> that organization and a few experts they bring in. They break the story to the public along
> with the document.
> 
> Is anyone liable for copyright violation? If so, who? Is there any case law establishing a
> precedent for prosecuting the leaker and/or the journalists who broke the story?

Google for "+scientology +copyright".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040527/df69acbd/attachment.bin