lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: dk at pwarchitects.com (dk) Subject: Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code Bart.Lansing@...ls.com wrote: > > Charlie... > > Put down the crack pipe and back away slowly. You are surely not > suggesting that this issue of Cisco's code has anything...at > all...remotely...in common with the people and actions you > listed...seriously...you're kidding...right?? > > Bart Lansing > Manager, Desktop Services > Kohl's IT > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. > and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary. > If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution > or use of the contents of this message is expressly prohibited. > If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and > notify us immediately at 262-703-7000. > > CAUTION: > Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's > reserves the right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and > received. Kohl's reserves the right to monitor messages by authorized > Kohl's Associates at any time > without any further consent. > Wow. Well Charlie's post was - at minimum - entertaining. Not to mention a bit thought provoking on where different peoples of similar ilk may take different turns on the morality (or duty) they apply to modern technical issues aside from what they are instructed to do by black-letter law. It also speaks to the wonder of issues we may have to face in the future with situations that indeed *will* have much in common with the souls mentioned. "We" always repeat the same old mistakes in each new venue we create. At some point laws & regulations should always be questioned, they don't just change themselves. These questions seem to come at the oddest times, over the oddest things sometimes... Anyway: The body of his message was filled with interesting content. In the future, perhaps you might restrain from mocking messages that are at least shorter than your overly-broad, vague, fear-clad corporate boilerplate sig. Are you actually required by corp policy to include this most droll thing *every* time you send mail? Gads, step away from the Memorial Day "Bonus Buys", get out of the cubicle and turn off the fluorescent lights. Go check out your reflection in a pond, go for a walk, stare at some fish Bart. -- dk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists