full-disclosure - Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: dk at pwarchitects.com (dk)
Subject: Breaking Laws Cisco's stolen code

Bart.Lansing@...ls.com wrote:

>
> Charlie...
>
> Put down the crack pipe and back away slowly.  You are surely not 
> suggesting that this issue of Cisco's code has anything...at 
> all...remotely...in common with the people and actions you 
> listed...seriously...you're kidding...right??
>
> Bart Lansing
> Manager, Desktop Services
> Kohl's IT
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
> and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary.
> If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution 
> or use of the contents of this message is expressly prohibited.
> If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and 
> notify us immediately at 262-703-7000.
>
> CAUTION:
> Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's 
> reserves the right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and 
> received. Kohl's reserves the right to monitor messages by authorized 
> Kohl's Associates at any time
> without any further consent.
>

Wow.
Well Charlie's post was - at minimum - entertaining. Not to mention a 
bit thought provoking on where different peoples of similar ilk may take 
different turns on the morality (or duty) they apply to modern technical 
issues aside from what they are instructed to do by black-letter law. It 
also speaks to the wonder of issues we may have to face in the future 
with situations that indeed *will* have much in common with the souls 
mentioned. "We" always repeat the same old mistakes in each new venue we 
create. At some point laws & regulations should always be questioned, 
they don't just change themselves. These questions seem to come at the 
oddest times, over the oddest things sometimes...

Anyway: The body of his message was filled with interesting content. In 
the future, perhaps you might restrain from mocking messages that are at 
least shorter than your overly-broad, vague, fear-clad corporate 
boilerplate sig. Are you actually required by corp policy to include 
this most droll thing *every* time you send mail?

Gads, step away from the Memorial Day "Bonus Buys", get out of the 
cubicle and turn off the fluorescent lights. Go check out your 
reflection in a pond, go for a walk, stare at some fish Bart.

-- 
dk