full-disclosure - M$ - so what should they do?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: nick at virus-l.demon.co.uk (Nick FitzGerald)
Subject: M$ - so what should they do?

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

> Actually, just doing that one *alone* (splitting it out so it isn't entwined into
> the OS) would probably do more than anything else.  But we're not likely to see
> that happen, not since the Microsoft witnesses swore on a Bible that IE was an
> integral part of the OS....

Yep -- the DoJ defense has many long and nasty tentacles that will 
ensure shoddiness and ongoing bad design "decisions" in MS software for 
many years to come.

Is this the first major case of "insecurity by enforced legal defense"?

Perhaps our law schools need to introduce a new course: "Software 
architecture priciples for Lawyers" ??

Regards,

Nick FitzGerald