lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: DoS in apache httpd 2.0.49, yet still apache much better than windows

Georgi Guninski security advisory #70, 2004

DoS in apache httpd 2.0.49, yet still apache much better than windows

Systems affected:
apache httpd 2.0.49, earlier 2.x versions were not tested. 1.3.x is safe.

Risk:  low for 32 bit systems, unknown for 64 bit systems with more than 
4GB virtual memory

Date: 28 June 2004

Legal Notice:
This Advisory is Copyright (c) 2004 Georgi Guninski.
You  may  not  modify	it   and   distribute	it   or   distribute   parts
of it without the author's written permission - this especially  applies  to
so called "vulnerabilities databases"  and  securityfocus,  microsoft,	cert
and mitre.
If   you   want    to	 link	 to    this    content	  use	 the	URL:
http://www.guninski.com/httpd1.html
Anything in this document may change without notice.

Disclaimer:
The  information  in  this  advisory  is  believed   to   be   true   though
it may be false.
The opinions  expressed  in  this  advisory  and  program  are	my  own  and
not   of   any	 company.    The   usual   standard   disclaimer    applies,
especially the fact that Georgi Guninski  is  not  liable  for	any  damages
caused by direct  or  indirect	use  of  the  information  or  functionality
provided  by  this  advisory  or  program.    Georgi   Guninski   bears   no
responsibility for  content  or  misuse  of  this  advisory  or  program  or
any derivatives thereof.

Description:

There is denial of service in apache httpd 2.0.49. It is possible to
consume arbitrary amount of memory.
On 64 bit systems with more than 4GB virtual memory this may lead to heap
based buffer overflow whose exploitation is unclear at the moment. 

Details:
The problem is in server/protocol.c ap_get_mime_headers_core:
------
      if (last_field != NULL) {
            if ((len > 0) && ((*field == '\t') || *field == ' ')) {
...
fold_buf = (char *)apr_palloc(r->pool, alloc_len);
-----
If header lines starts with TAB or SPACE, apache allocates memory for it.

This allows making arbitrary long header lines.

The following applies to 64 bit systems with a lot of virtual memory if
sizeof(long)==8 and sizeof(int)==4.

This code can be hit on line 743: 
ap_escape_html(r->pool, last_field),
last_field can be arbitrary long.
Looking into ap_escape_html shows:
----
int i, j;

for (i = 0, j = 0; s[i] != '\0'; i++)
        if (s[i] == '<' || s[i] == '>')
            j += 3;
        else if (s[i] == '&')
            j += 4;

    if (j == 0)
        return apr_pstrmemdup(p, s, i);

    x = apr_palloc(p, i + j + 1);

----
(i+j+1) can be made almost arbitraty because of int signedness.
On linux x86_64 it was confirmed that sending about 820MB of data overflows
(i+j+1) which leads to a crash in memcpy, but with good heap layout more
can be done.

Probably only (i) can wrap, but because of the way in which apache leaks
memory this is not tested yet.


Fix:

Unofficial fix from an Apache httpd developer, use at your risk.
----------------------------------
Index: server/protocol.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/server/protocol.c,v
retrieving revision 1.148
diff -u -r1.148 protocol.c
--- server/protocol.c	22 Apr 2004 22:38:03 -0000	1.148
+++ server/protocol.c	13 Jun 2004 19:47:36 -0000
@@ -716,6 +716,23 @@
                  * continuations that span many many lines.
                  */
                 apr_size_t fold_len = last_len + len + 1; /* trailing null */
+
+                if ((fold_len - 1) > r->server->limit_req_fieldsize) {
+                    r->status = HTTP_BAD_REQUEST;
+                    /* report what we have accumulated so far before the
+                     * overflow (last_field) as the field with the problem
+                     */
+                    apr_table_setn(r->notes, "error-notes",
+                                   apr_pstrcat(r->pool,
+                                               "Size of a request header field " 
+                                               "after folding "
+                                               "exceeds server limit.<br />\n"
+                                               "<pre>\n",
+                                               ap_escape_html(r->pool, last_field),
+                                               "</pre>\n", NULL));
+                    return;
+                }
+
                 if (fold_len > alloc_len) {
                     char *fold_buf;
                     alloc_len += alloc_len;
----------------------------------
Workaround:
not known.

Vendor status:
security@...che.org are aware of the bug

Georgi Guninski
http://www.guninski.com



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ