From: philipp.freiberger at brodos.de (philipp.freiberger@...dos.de)
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1747 - 32 msgs



und mir f?llt dazu auch nur google ein...

sorry... aber sobald es an "bunte" sachen geht hab ich kein plan mehr...

mfg Philipp
ps: ich hab mich am So. den ganzen tag mit meinem X gepr?gelt damit es das macht was es soll - da kommt man sich vor als h?tte man noch nie Linux gesehen... :)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1747 - 32 msgs (05-Jul-2004 16:48)
From:    full-disclosure-request@...ts.netsys.com
To:      philipp.freiberger@...dos.de

> Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to
> 	full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	full-disclosure-request@...ts.netsys.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability
>        Reporting and Response Guidelines (dave)
>    2. Re:Bugtraq Security Systems (bitlance winter)
>    3. RE: The "Drew Copley is a prick" Poll update
>        [Time to Grow Up] (Mortis)
>    4. Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (amforward@...lsurf.com)
>    5. Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and
>        ResponseGuidelines (Fred Mobach)
>    6. [ GLSA 200407-03 ] Apache 2: Remote denial of service attack (Thierry 
> Carrez)
>    7. [ GLSA 200407-04 ] Pure-FTPd: Potential DoS when maximum connections
>        is reached (Thierry Carrez)
>    8. Re: Web sites compromised by IIS attack (Jason Coombs)
>    9. Re: Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (System Outage)
>   10. Re: Re:Bugtraq Security Systems (System Outage)
>   11. Re:Bugtraq Security Systems (Boggles)
>   12. RE: IE Web Browser: "Sitting Duck" (joe)
>   13. Re: Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (D.J. Capelis)
>   14. RE: [Dailydave] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security 
> Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines (Steve W. Manzuik)
>   15. Re: Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (amforward@...lsurf.
> com)
>   16. Re: Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (Rudolf Polzer)
>   17. XSS in 12Planet Chat Server 2.9 (Donato Ferrante)
>   18. Re: HP urges users to erase Netscape to avoid security
>        problems (Szilveszter Adam)
>   19. Huge amounts of Citipank phishing spam seen this weekend. (Feher 
> Tamas)
>   20. CYBSEC - Security Advisory: Denial of Service in IBM WebSphere
>        Edge Server (Leandro Meiners)
>   21. Unreal ircd 3.2 clocking subsystem vulnerability (bartavelle)
>   22. Re: [FD] VERY HIGH VULNERABILITY DISCLOSURE !!! MASS ROOT POSSIBLE !!!
>  PLEASE BE ATTENTIVE !!! (Thomas Binder)
>   23. Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and 
> Response Guidelines (Georgi Guninski)
>   24. Re: Huge amounts of Citipank phishing spam seen this weekend. (Duncan 
> Hill)
>   25. Re: Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (System Outage)
>   26. RE: Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability (Mark Laurence)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 13:18:35 -0400
> From: dave <dave@...unitysec.com>
> To: OIS <announcements@...afety.org>
> CC: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, NTBUGTRAQ@...TSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM,
>    full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability
>  Reporting and Response Guidelines
> 
> Nobody trusts the OIS or its motives. I imagine this is similar to the 
> feedback you've gotten from everyone else as well, but Immunity has no 
> plans to subscribe to your guidelines, and is going to oppose any 
> efforts you make to legislate those guidelines as law. In section 1.1 
> the draft proposes that the purpose of the OIS's model is to protect 
> systems from vulnerabilities. This is fairly obviously untrue - the 
> purpose of the OIS is to lobby towards a business model for Microsoft 
> and the other OIS members that involves the removal of non-compliant 
> security researchers.
> 
> This call for feedback is a thinly disguised attempt to get public 
> legitimacy and allow the OIS to claim it has community backing, which it 
> clearly does not.
> 
> It's rare, but there are still security companies and individuals who do 
> not owe their entire business to money from Microsoft. It's July 4th. 
> and some of us are Americans who understand the concept of independance.
> 
> Dave Aitel
> Immunity, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> OIS wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > The Organization for Internet Safety (OIS) extends an invitation to
> > the readers of the BugTraq, NTBugtraq, and Full-Disclosure mailing
> > lists to participate in the ongoing public review of the OIS Security
> > Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines.
> > The OIS reviews the Guidelines annually to ensure that they remain
> > useful and relevant to the security community and, most importantly,
> > to the millions of computer users who are the ultimate beneficiaries
> > of effective computer security practices.  Over the past year, OIS
> > has received feedback from many adopters of the Guidelines as well as
> > from several public-private partnerships, and have incorporated much
> > of this feedback into an interim version that is available at
> > http://www.oisafety.org/review/draft-1.5.pdf.  We recommend reviewing
> > the interim version, but reviewers are welcome to provide feedback on
> > the original version at http://www.oisafety.org/reference/process.pdf
> > if they would like.
> >
> > For more information on the public review, please visit
> > http://www.oisafety.org/review-1.5.html.  The closing date for the
> > review has been extended until 16 July 2004.  We look forward to your
> > feedback.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > The Organization for Internet Safety
> > www.oisafety.org
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: PGP 8.0.3
> >
> > iQA/AwUBQOWQgbF9hclyvjnOEQIhmACfYlaHX2NnJbHUCaCYfMHO4tkGDh0AoMzz
> > KWNTvxgQVKXiC1OU9CR/rXYF
> > =4mT/
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> From: "bitlance winter" <bitlance_3@...mail.com>
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:36:50 +0000
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re:Bugtraq Security Systems
> 
> Who are YOU,Bugtraq Security Systems?
> Are YOU foo,bar.foobar?
> ;)
> YOU say LOVE,OK.
> 
> [blockquote]
> "With burning brain and heart of hate,
> I sought my wronger, early, late,
> And all the wretched night and day
> My dream and thought was slay, and slay.
> My better self rose uppermost,
> The beast within my bosom lost
> Itself in love; peace from afar
> Shone o'er me radiant like a star.
> I Slew my wronger with a deed,
> A deed of love; I made him bleed
> With kindness, and I filled for years
> His soul with tenderness and tears."
> 
> Let those who aim at the right life, who believe that they love Truth, 
> cease 
> to passionately oppose themselves to others, and let them strive to calmly 
> and wisely understand them, and in thus acting toward others they will be 
> conquering themselves; and while sympathizing with others, their own souls 
> will be fed with the heavenly dews of kindness, and their hearts be 
> strengthened and refreshed in the Pleasant Pastures of Peace.
> [/blockauote]
> 
> Best Regards.
> --
> bitlance winter.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfeer 
> Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:17:07 -0400
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> From: Mortis <m0rtis@...lphia.net>
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] The "Drew Copley is a prick" Poll update
>   [Time to Grow Up]
> 
> I told you that would be more fun than fishing with dynamite.
> 
> Plenty of fresh worms for a hungry turkey.
> 
> Sort your mail box and go to town.
> --
> Libel-libel,
> Dan eel
> http://full-disclosure.50megs.com/
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun,  4 Jul 2004 19:10:44 +0000
> From: amforward@...lsurf.com
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability
> 
> This message is in MIME format.
> 
> ---MOQ1088968244aa66ff8657f08d3292ceb7b3ae771de7
> Brief
> --------------
> While I was playing with Gmail, I found a bug that may disclose
> information about the users currently attempting to register a new
> Gmail account. This seems to be a vulnerability with low severity (at
> least until now).
> 
> CheckAvailability Script
> --------------
> In the registration page, the "Check Availability" button queries a
> certain script, namely /accounts/CheckAvailability. The script takes
> the desired username, and checks if it is available. If it is not
> available, it suggests other usernames by contactenating, for example,
> your last name to it.
> 
> The Problem
> --------------
> There seems to be a thread-safety problem with CheckAvailability
> script. When the script is under heavy stress, it may return answers
> to queries that are not yours, revealing others' desired usernames,
> and first and last names.(see attached screen shot)
> 
> 
> Reproduction
> --------------
> To reproduce it, you should:
> 
> AND
> a. Have a valid Gmail invitation
> b. Frequently Invoke CheckAvailability by
> ~  OR
> ~  1. Creating a tool that automates the script invocation.
> ~  2. Having the patience and keep clicking the button frequently (this
> works too!).
> 
> 
> I have not yet carefully studied the script, but I think it might not
> be a problem with this script only, but others as well. Your thoughts
> are appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Ahmed Motaz
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailsurf.com your communication portal for SMS,
> Email, Fax, E-Cards and more. www.mailsurf.com
> 
> ---MOQ1088968244aa66ff8657f08d3292ceb7b3ae771de7
> Gmail service is in Beta. You have no credibility posting this advisory. =
> The correct channel to post such "bugs" is the Gmail contact link for "bu=
> g reports".=20
> =20
> If you weren't a script kiddie or scene whore, you would have known to ho=
> ld information until such a time that Gmail became a public service.
> =20
> Then and only then would anyone take this advisory seriously!
> =20
> You obviously have no understanding of the "Beta" state of a development.=
>  The fact that a team of developers are in the state of "Beta" means that=
>  the developers are fully aware the service may not be entirely secure an=
> d they wish feedback via Google's own beta "bug report" channels.
> =20
> All in all, this is  a "beta bug report" and nothing else. If you had wai=
> ted until the Gmail dev team declared gmail a public release, you would h=
> ave gained more respect in the security community scene.
> =20
> Cheerio
> =20
> =20
> 
> 	=09
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
> --0-509345037-1088977213=3D:9720
> 
> A name like "Bugtraq Security Systems" Sounds like a typical name a scrip=
> t kiddie group or scene whore group would use to try and gain an easy nam=
> e within the scene.
> 
>  They (Bugtraq Security Systems) obviously thought... Hey.. "if we whore =
> a high profile name and make our website look professional, people will b=
> uy it and think we're elite".=20
> 
> Lol, if you had any cred in the security community scene, you just lost i=
> t by mentioning the key words "Defcon" and "Drew Copley is a prick" refer=
> ences.
> 
> All you are making yourself out to be is a jealous scene whore who wishes=
>  they had the 0-day exclusives that Eyee Security obtain and you wish you=
>  were as good as they are.=20
> 
> You have no right to come on a high profile security mailing list with su=
> ch childish remarks towards a highly respected Security Group as Eyee. Go=
>  find some "elite" zero day and come back when you manage to gain as much=
>  respect as Eyee Security has within the security community scene.
> 
> Cheerio
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
> http://mail.yahoo.com=20
> --0-281874980-1088978667=3D:60119
> The following advisory is also available in pdf for download at
> http://www.cybsec.com/vuln/IBM-WebSphere-Edge-Server-DOS.pdf
> 
> CYBSEC S.A.
> www.cybsec.com
> 
> Advisory Name: Denial of Service in WebSphere Edge Server.
> Vulnerability Class: Denial of Service
> Release Date: June 2nd 2004
> Affected Applications:  =20
> 
>       * WebSphere Edge Components Caching Proxy 5.02 using
>         JunctionRewrite with UseCookiedirective.=20
> 
> Not Affected Applications:=20
> 
>       * WebSphere Edge Components Caching Proxy 5.02 NOT using
>         JunctionRewrite with UseCookie directive.  =20
>       * WebSphere Edge Components Caching Proxy 5.00
> 
> Affected Platforms:=20
> 
>       * SUSE SLES 8=20
>       * SUSE SLES 8 Service Pack 1=20
>       * SUSE SLES 8 Service Pack 3=20
>       * SUSE SLES 8 Service Pack 3=20
>       * Apparently all platforms running WebSphere Edge Server
> 
> Local / Remote: Remote
> Severity: High
> Author: Leandro Meiners.
> Vendor Status:=20
> 
>       * Fix included in WebSphere Application Server 5.0.3 (to be
>         released)=20
>       * Patch available from IBM for clients with Support Level 2 or 3
> 
> Reference to Vulnerability Disclosure Policy:=20
> http://www.cybsec.com/vulnerability_policy.pdf
> 
> Overview:
> 
> WebSphere Edge Component Caching Proxy, part of WebSphere Application
> Sever, is a reverse proxy designed to reduce bandwidth use and improve a
> Web site's speed and reliability by providing a point-of-presence node
> for one or more back-end content servers. It is built to work with
> content provided by one or more backend WebSphere Application Servers.
> 
> Vulnerability Description:
> 
> The vulnerability discovered allows a remote attacker to generate a
> denial of service condition against the WebSphere Edge Component Caching
> Proxy.=20
> 
> If the reverse proxy is configured with the JunctionRewrite directive
> being active, a remote attacker can trivially cause a denial of service
> by executing the GET HTTP method without parameters.
> 
> Exploit:
> 
> $ echo =B4GET=A1 | nc <victim_host_ip> <proxy_port>
> 
> Solutions:
> 
> If JunctionRewrite is unnecessary, disabling it will suffice to prevent
> the Denial of Service. Also if the option UseCookie in the
> JunctionRewrite directive is unnecessary disabling it will suffice to
> prevent the Denial of Service.
> 
> Vendor Response:
> 
> IBM opened a case regarding the vulnerability and provided a patch
> within 2 weeks of the initial contact.
> 
> Contact Information:
> 
> For more information regarding the vulnerability feel free to contact
> the author at lmeiners@...sec.com.
> 
> For more information regarding CYBSEC: www.cybsec.com
> 
> 
> ----------------------------
> Leandro Meiners
> CYBSEC S.A. Security Systems
> E-mail: lmeiners@...sec.com
> Tel/Fax: [54-11] 4382-1600
> Web: http://www.cybsec.com
> 
> --=-KxxekzTaBeyTiwzQ+aFI
> If it's not about respect then what is it about?=20
> =20
> You have no respect for the Gmail Team, that's for sure.
> =20
> I guess this list isn't about respect...
> =20
> It's about kiddies posting advisories and exploits for fun and little car=
> e for the vendor(s).
> =20
> =20
> Cheerio
> =20
> 
> amforward@...lsurf.com wrote:
> System Outage wrote:
> 
> |The correct channel to post such "bugs" is the Gmail contact link for "b=
> ug=20
> |reports".=20
> 
> I have already contacted Gmail about 10 days ago, but I have not received=
>  any=20
> replies till this moment.
> 
> |If you had waited until the Gmail dev team declared gmail a public relea=
> se,=20
> |you would have gained more respect in the security community scene.
> 
> I don't think this is about respect afterall.
> 
> Regards,
> Ahmed Motaz
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailsurf.com your communication portal for SMS,
> Email, Fax, E-Cards and more. www.mailsurf.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> 	=09
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> --0-223874168-1089035202=3D:27338
> "You have no respect for the Gmail Team, that's for sure."
> Why would he? Respect is earned not given for free.
> =20
> "It's about kiddies posting advisories and exploits for fun and little ca=
> re
> for the vendor(s)."
> No the reason they are generally supposed to be posted AFAIK is so that t=
> he
> secuirty concious user is aware and can take steps to prevent them from
> being exploited. Granted reasonable steps should be taken to contact the
> vendor, if they dont respond then what can one do?
> =20
> Thanks
> Mark
> =20
> 
> 
>    _____ =20
> 
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of System Outag=
> e
> Sent: 05 July 2004 14:47
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Gmail Information Disclosure Vulnerability
> 
> 
> If it's not about respect then what is it about?=20
> =20
> =20
> =20
> I guess this list isn't about respect...
> =20
> It's about kiddies posting advisories and exploits for fun and little car=
> e
> for the vendor(s).
> =20
> =20
> Cheerio
> =20
> 
> amforward@...lsurf.com wrote:
> 
> System Outage wrote:
> 
> |The correct channel to post such "bugs" is the Gmail contact link for "b=
> ug=20
> |reports".=20
> 
> I have already contacted Gmail about 10 days ago, but I have not received
> any=20
> replies till this moment.
> 
> |If you had waited until the Gmail dev team declared gmail a public relea=
> se,
> 
> |you would have gained more respect in the security community scene.
> 
> I don't think this is about respect afterall.
> 
> Regards,
> Ahmed Motaz
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailsurf.com your communication portal for SMS,
> Email, Fax, E-Cards and more. www.mailsurf.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    _____ =20
> 
> Do you Yahoo!?
> HYPERLINK
> "http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/virus/*http://promotions.yahoo.c=
> om/
> new_mail/static/protection.html"Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nast=
> y
> viruses.
> 
> 
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.656 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 09/04/2004
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.656 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 09/04/2004
> =20
> 
> ------=3D_NextPart_000_021E_01C462A2.A05CB230


To: full-disclosure-request@...ts.netsys.com
    full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists