full-disclosure - antisemtism, FD and bandwidth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: ge at egotistical.reprehensible.net (Gadi Evron)
Subject: antisemtism, FD and bandwidth - what I want
 out of it

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Raymond Morsman wrote:

| Citeren Gadi Evron <ge@...tistical.reprehensible.net>:
|
|
|>Moderators: this is not only off-topic (unlike zombies sending
|>viruses
|>here), this is outrageous!
|
|
| You are off-topic too.

I agree, I stated as much.

| The discussion whether FD should be moderated has been around forever,
| in the hardest times.

Indeed. I am talking about Full Disclosure as an ideology, not this list.

| This is an unmoderated list; it's not going to change the rules just
| because you don't like the message. It merely is the trade-off of total
| freedom of speech, which this list tries to maintain.

Wrong, it is a mailing list for total freedom of speech for security.
Why not do that? If not here, somewhere else. Is all I am saying.

The message of FD is important. I only wish it was serious.

| P.S. Remember: just because you can't hear them it doesn't mean the
| thoughts are there. It's better to know your opponent than having a
| secret enemy.

:)

	Gadi Evron.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFA/5eXqH6NtwbH1FARAqiJAJ0eDbnRnIjfXIvg/d8dbgRPEkDIuwCfXWOT
MtKvSGP0lZw4Yg9akrdpJsE=
=+gBk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----