lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Jos at meltemi.co.uk (Jos Osborne) Subject: lame bitching about xpsp2 >Release candidates are not beta's. That's why beta's are called beta's >and releasecandidates releasecandidates. > >Eventhough, beta's should already have a certain reliability, since >beta means: ready for a scheduled releasetime. That is even more so >for releasecandidates because (yes:) they are releasecandidates. So they'd be Gamma's? Jos