full-disclosure - Re: Re: open telnet port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: kenneth.d.ng at gmail.com (Kenneth Ng)
Subject: Re: Re: open telnet port

Restarting the SSH daemon won't kill processes, but overlaying the
openssl libraries with a new version will, or has, in my case.  Saved
me from having to fly to the other coast.


On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:48:21 -0700, Andrew Farmer <andfarm@...novis.com> wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2004, at 06:28, ktabic wrote:
> >> Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any
> >> more?
> >> (That is a genuine question - as far as I can see, SSH is always a
> >> perfect replacement).
> >
> > How about, as a service to enable as you are updating SSH remotely from
> > the other side of the country to fix the most recent problem security
> > problem and need a backup system to get into the server in the event
> > that something goes wrong?
> 
> Restarting the SSH daemon won't kill open sessions.
> 
> 
> 
>