lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: rsumida at csulb.edu (Ryan Sumida) Subject: Good Network Access Control solution using Thank you for the write up, it is very informative. I forgot to mention in my post that our campus does not support the Dorm users at all. For the most part their network is wide open. They bring in their own computers and install/uninstall any OS/software that they want. I skimmed through your paper and noticed all the solutions require client software. Is there a product that uses a network based scan (e.g. Nessus) or NIDS to validate network access? Thanks, Ryan "Buelna, Derek" <derek.buelna@...ice.xerox.com> wrote on 09/16/2004 02:20:50 PM: > I wrote a paper on enforcing policy at the perimeter that you might find useful. > http://www.giac.org/practical/GSEC/Derek_Buelna_GSEC.pdf > > Cheers, > > -Derek > > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure- > admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Sumida > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 12:43 PM > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Good Network Access Control solution using dot1x? > > Hello Security Folk, > > Looking for a network solution to mitigate the virus/worm problems in > our university dorm network. Has any one company moved ahead of the > pack in the port based NAC market? I'm not sure if this is the best way > to go but in theory it would solve some of our problems. At the moment > our IPS is blocking over 90,000 attacks/hour from the dorm area alone! > > A solution similar to Perfigo's CleanMachine product is what I have in > mind but with 802.1x support. When end-users would like to get on the > network they start in a temporary restricted VLAN. The system will then > be scanned (Nessus scan , etc.) for vulnerabilities defined by the > security policy. If compliant then the mac is granted network access > and the port is then changing to a non-restricted VLAN. If non- > compliant the mac is put on quarantine list and the port is then set to > "jailed" VLAN. > > Anyone know of a good product that can do this or something similar? > > > Regards, > > Ryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040916/47d8bbd4/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists