full-disclosure - Shows when no limits are set or restricted shell or bat access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: kf_lists at secnetops.com (KF_lists)
Subject: Shows when no limits are set or restricted
 shell or bat access

I do not believe the point was to show that you can chew up system 
resources... although that IS a side effect. That was not the point.

Add a sleep statement in there if it makes you feel better.
-KF


Clairmont, Jan M wrote:
> 
> ;;for %i in (*.exe) do start %i %n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n
> ;;for %i in (*.exe) do start %i AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.... (type as ;;much "A"-s as cmd.exe allows on one line.)
> 
> 
> Any system UNIX at least use to churn and eat system resources with a spawned
> shell, this is not new on any system.    With unlimited program execution  you can
> lock almost any system with a repeating shell program, but cute anyway.8->
> 
> 
> Jan Clairmont
> Unix Security Support/Consultant
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>