full-disclosure - Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: zeedo at reboot-robot.net (zeedo)
Subject: Sending remote procedure calls through
	e-mail (RPC-Mail)

On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 07:34 -0500, michael williamson wrote:
<snip>
>  This sure does demonstrate
> how _useless_ NAT really is for security. 

Possibly because NAT isn't a security mechanism.

-- 
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue

  http://www.bsrf.org.uk

[ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0xD82BDB6F ]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041020/2869fdcd/attachment.bin