| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: yossarian at planet.nl (yossarian) Subject: OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com) Interesting - who said that DMCA or the Communications Decency Act or the Patriot Act were tech friendly? These three are at best pro-certain unmentionable tech companies, but basically against the free flow of information, which many consider a condition sin qua non for tech development. Probably news.com wants to rally the vote of the techies for Bush.... If they buy that, they truly deserve another tech-slump, which started if memory serves me right, round the time GWB got an election... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew" <notes@...w.ca> To: "Nancy Kramer" <nekramer@...dtheater.net>; "Paul Schmehl" <pauls@...allas.edu>; <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com) > <BR> > And don't forget to read some of the comments, like: "Wow is this <BR> > misleading Jim Grady -- 10/28/04"<BR> > Summing it up, Bush wasn't included in the score, and being "pro tech" <BR> > doesn't mean you'd vote the way their scoring system says you should.<BR> > <BR> > At 01:17 AM 11/2/2004, Nancy Kramer wrote:<BR> > >Continuing in the political vein<BR> > ><BR> > >See the link below for the party who is most tech friendly in the US.<BR> > ><BR> > >http://news.com.com/2009-1028_3-5431061.html<BR> > ><BR> > >The results surprised me.<BR> > ><BR> > >Regards,<BR> > ><BR> > >Nancy Kramer<BR> > >Webmaster http://www.americandreamcars.com<BR> > >Free Color Picture Ads for Collector Cars<BR> > >One of the Ten Best Places To Buy or Sell a Collector Car on the Web<BR> > ><BR> > ><BR> > ><BR> > >At 06:43 PM 11/1/2004, Paul Schmehl wrote:<BR> > ><BR> > >>--On Sunday, October 31, 2004 09:59:55 PM -0600 "J.A. Terranson" <BR> > >><measl@....org> wrote:<BR> > >>><BR> > >>>As Nader supporters continually point out, Kerry is a compromised,<BR> > >>>centrist Democrat,<BR> > >><BR> > >>Calling Kerry a centrist Democrat is akin to calling pigs flamingos.<BR> > >><BR> > >>You know the rest...<BR> > >><BR> > >>Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)<BR> > >>Adjunct Information Security Officer<BR> > >>The University of Texas at Dallas<BR> > >>AVIEN Founding Member<BR> > >>http://www.utdallas.edu<BR> > >><BR> > >>_______________________________________________<BR> > >>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<BR> > >>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html<BR> > >><BR> > >><BR> > >><BR> > >><BR> > >><BR> > >><BR> > >>---<BR> > >>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.<BR> > >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).<BR> > >>Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004<BR> > ><BR> > ><BR> > ><BR> > >---<BR> > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.<BR> > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).<BR> > >Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004<BR> > <BR> > _______________________________________________<BR> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<BR> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists